Key points
- Online doctors owe the same basic duty of reasonable care.
- The Telemedicine Act 1997 is listed by MOH as not yet enforced.
- The MMC's 2024 Guideline on Telemedicine sets professional expectations.
- Recognising when an in-person exam is needed is central.
- Save chats, logs and prescriptions before anything else.
Online consultations through apps, insurer portals and clinic video calls are now common. They are convenient for minor illnesses and follow-ups. The risk is that some conditions cannot be safely assessed without an examination, and a missed diagnosis may cause serious harm.
What law applies to telemedicine in Malaysia?
- The Telemedicine Act 1997 (Act 564) comes into force only on a date appointed by the Minister. The Ministry of Health lists it as "yet to be enforced".
- Doctors remain regulated by the Medical Act 1971 and the Malaysian Medical Council's (MMC) codes.
- The MMC Guideline on Telemedicine, endorsed on 23 January 2024, replaced the earlier COVID-era advisory on virtual consultations. Among other things, it says virtual consultations should generally follow an established doctor-patient relationship, with first virtual consultations possible in some situations, especially in primary care, if the doctor can justify it and follows the guideline.
What is expected of a doctor online?
From a clinical and legal point of view, the key questions are usually:
- Did the doctor take an adequate history and ask about red-flag symptoms?
- Did the doctor recognise the limits of a remote assessment and advise an in-person examination or emergency care where needed?
- Was the advice and any prescription appropriate on the information available?
- Were the patient's identity, consent and records properly handled?
- Were clear safety-net instructions given, such as "go to the emergency department if…"?
The legal standard remains that of a reasonably competent practitioner, assessed with expert evidence. See misdiagnosis claims.
Who is responsible: the doctor or the platform?
- The consulting doctor owes you a personal duty of care.
- The platform or clinic may be responsible depending on whether it employed the doctor, how it presented the service, and its own systems (for example, triage questions or record-keeping).
- Platform terms often try to limit liability. Whether those terms are effective depends on the wording and the law.
Have a question about your own situation? Ask on WhatsApp
What evidence should I save?
- Screenshots of the full chat, including timestamps.
- Any video call logs, booking confirmations and receipts.
- E-prescriptions and medical certificates.
- Your own record of symptoms you reported.
- Records from the later in-person doctor or hospital that made the correct diagnosis.
Ask the platform in writing for a copy of your consultation records. Do not delete the app or your account.
Common mistakes
- Deleting the app or chat history.
- Not mentioning the online consultation to the next doctor.
- Assuming the platform's terms prevent any claim.
- Waiting too long; time limits apply.
When to speak to a lawyer
If a delayed diagnosis after an online consultation led to serious harm, such as a missed infection, appendicitis, heart attack or stroke. You can contact us; every case depends on its facts.
Frequently asked questions
Is a doctor online held to a lower standard?
No. The doctor must act reasonably in the circumstances, which includes knowing the limits of remote care.
The doctor was outside Malaysia. Can I claim?
Possibly, but it is more complex. The MMC guideline addresses doctors outside Malaysia treating patients here, and jurisdiction and enforcement questions arise.
Can I complain to the MMC?
Yes, about a registered doctor's conduct. See complaining to the MMC.
I accepted the platform's terms. Can I still sue?
Possibly. Terms limiting liability for negligence are not always effective, especially for personal injury.
Do I need my records from the platform?
Yes. Request them in writing and keep your own screenshots too.
Sources & fact check
Legal points in this article were checked against the primary sources below. The law can change; this is general information, not legal advice.
- Malaysian Medical Council, Guideline on Telemedicine (endorsed 23 January 2024)
- Ministry of Health: Telemedicine Act 1997 (Act 564) listing – "yet to be enforced"
- Malaysian Medical Council, Code of Professional Conduct 2019
- Medical Act 1971 (Act 50), Malaysian Medical Council copy
- Zulhasnimar bt Hasan Basri & Anor v Dr Kuppu Velumani P & Ors [2017] 5 MLJ 438 (Federal Court) (reported judgment)
Fact-checked on 17 Oct 2026
Facing a similar situation? WhatsApp us a short summary. Please do not send confidential documents until we confirm we can act for you.
Related practice area: Medical negligence claims in Malaysia

