Kuala Lumpur
Medical negligence lawyers in Kuala Lumpur
How medical negligence matters for clients in Kuala Lumpur usually run, which courts hear them, and where to find our office.
Chris & Partners acts for clients in Kuala Lumpur on medical negligence matters. Dr Chee Hui Bing, who leads the firm, is an Advocate & Solicitor and a former medical doctor. We work in English, Bahasa Malaysia and Chinese.
Courts that hear these matters
- Kuala Lumpur High Court (Jalan Duta): civil claims above RM1 million, medical negligence actions and divorce petitions
How the process usually works
- We obtain the complete medical records from the hospital or clinic.
- An independent medical expert reviews the records on breach of duty and causation.
- A letter of demand is sent to the doctor or hospital.
- If the matter does not resolve, a Writ of Summons and Statement of Claim are filed in the High Court, followed by case management, expert reports and trial.
Our office for Kuala Lumpur
Mont Kiara, Kuala Lumpur
E-7-18, Plaza Mont Kiara, Jalan Kiara, Mont Kiara, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur
Mont Kiara, Kuala Lumpur · Google Maps · Waze
Common questions
What should I do first if I think medical negligence harmed me or a family member?
Start by asking the hospital for a copy of the complete medical record; both private and government hospitals must release it on request. Write down the key dates carefully, because time limits apply to every claim. Then have a lawyer make a preliminary assessment of the records and the events, so you know whether an expert review is worth pursuing.
What is the Bolam-Bolitho test that Malaysian courts apply?
It is the standard of care in medical negligence, accepted by the Federal Court in Foo Fio Na v Dr Soo Fook Mun [2007] 1 MLJ 593. A doctor is not negligent if the conduct matches a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of medical opinion in the same field (Bolam), provided that opinion withstands logical analysis (Bolitho). It applies to diagnosis and treatment.
Is the test different for informed consent and risk disclosure?
Yes. For diagnosis and treatment, the court applies Bolam with the Bolitho qualification. For the duty to disclose risks before treatment, the test is different: the approach in Rogers v Whitaker, which Malaysia adopted in Foo Fio Na. The question is whether the patient was told of the material risks, not simply whether other doctors would have said the same.
How long do I have to file a medical negligence claim in Malaysia?
Section 6(1)(a) of the Limitation Act 1953 gives six years from the date the cause of action accrued. Section 6A, added by the Limitation (Amendment) Act 2018, allows three years from the date of knowledge (with a 15-year long-stop), but only for negligence claims not involving personal injuries, so it does not extend the time for a personal-injury medical negligence claim. Claims against government hospitals have extra notice requirements.
Guides on this topic
- Informed Consent Compared: Foo Fio Na, Montgomery and Hii Chii Kok
- Beyond the Licence: Exemplary Damages for Aesthetic Work Outside a Doctor’s LCP
- Nurul Iman v Gleneagles Hospital KL [2025] 9 MLJ 22 — RM 1.1 Million for Negligent Carpal Tunnel Release
- Two Tests, One Profession: How Zulhasnimar Settled the Standard of Care
- Siow Ching Yee v Columbia Asia: Independent Contractor Defence Rejected
- 基本期限:六年,或36个月
Medical negligence lawyers in other cities
Every matter is different, and timelines depend on the court and the parties. This page is general information, not legal advice. Medical negligence claims in Malaysia
Facing a similar situation? WhatsApp us a short summary. Please do not send confidential documents until we confirm we can act for you.
Tell us what happened. We will explain your options.
Speak to us in English, Bahasa Malaysia or 中文. Please do not send confidential documents until we confirm we can act for you.