Key points
- A letter of demand is not a judgment, but do not ignore it.
- Keep a copy of the post and stop further sharing.
- Check meaning and defences: truth, fair comment, privilege.
- Options include a denial, correction, apology, offer of amends or negotiated settlement.
- Reply carefully, ideally through a lawyer.
A letter from a law firm saying you have defamed someone, demanding an apology and compensation within days, can be alarming. It is a serious step, but it is not a court judgment. A calm, well-advised response can often resolve the matter or put you in a strong position if it goes further.
Step 1: Read the letter carefully
Identify:
- Who is complaining and who the lawyers act for.
- What statement is complained of, where and when it was published.
- What they demand: removal, apology, undertaking, compensation, costs.
- The deadline for your response.
The deadline in a letter is set by the other side, not the court. But ignoring it often leads to a writ being filed, and an early response gives you more control.
Step 2: Preserve, but stop spreading
- Keep a copy of what you posted or sent, including the date, platform and audience.
- Do not repost, comment further or discuss the complaint publicly.
- Consider whether temporarily hiding or removing the post would reduce further harm. Take advice on this, because removal is not an admission but can be relevant to the dispute.
- Do not delete related evidence such as your sources or messages.
Step 3: Check your defences
Discuss with your lawyer whether you have a defence:
- Justification (truth): can you prove the statement is substantially true?
- Fair comment: was it an honest opinion on a matter of public interest, based on true facts?
- Privilege: was it said in a protected context, such as a complaint to a proper authority made in good faith?
- Meaning: what would an ordinary reader understand it to mean? Sometimes the complaint reads more into the words than they say.
See defamation defences.
Have a question about your own situation? Ask on WhatsApp
Step 4: Choose a response strategy
- Deny and explain: if you have a good defence, a firm but polite reply setting out your position.
- Clarify or correct: if part of the statement was wrong, a correction can limit the dispute.
- Apologise and retract: a sincere, agreed apology and removal often resolves cases and can be relevant to damages.
- Offer of amends: the Defamation Act 1957 provides a procedure for unintentional defamation where the publisher offers a suitable correction and apology; strict conditions apply.
- Negotiate: compensation and costs can be discussed, often on a without-prejudice basis.
Step 5: Reply through a lawyer
Your reply may be shown to a court later. A lawyer can frame it so you do not make admissions you do not intend, and can mark settlement discussions "without prejudice" where appropriate.
Common mistakes: ignoring the letter, replying emotionally on social media, admitting more than necessary, apologising in words that create new problems, and deleting your evidence.
When to speak to a lawyer
As soon as you receive the letter, before the deadline. You can contact us; every case depends on its facts.
Frequently asked questions
Will apologising mean I lose the case?
An apology can resolve a dispute and can be relevant to damages, but its wording matters. Get advice before apologising.
Can I be sued for something I posted in a private group?
Yes, publication to group members can be enough. The size and nature of the audience is relevant to the seriousness.
Is this also a criminal matter?
Some online conduct can involve offences such as under the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998, but a letter of demand is a civil step. See s.233 CMA vs civil defamation.
What if I only shared someone else's post?
Sharing or repeating a defamatory statement can be publication. Your role and knowledge are relevant.
What if I do nothing and they file a writ?
You will then have strict court deadlines. See received a writ of summons.
Sources & fact check
Legal points in this article were checked against the primary sources below. The law can change; this is general information, not legal advice.
- Defamation Act 1957 (Act 286), AGC Laws of Malaysia
- Evidence Act 1950 (Act 56), including section 114A, AGC Laws of Malaysia
Fact-checked on 17 Oct 2026
Facing a similar situation? WhatsApp us a short summary. Please do not send confidential documents until we confirm we can act for you.
Related practice area: Civil litigation and debt recovery

