{"id":1896,"date":"2026-04-30T21:27:35","date_gmt":"2026-04-30T13:27:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/"},"modified":"2026-04-30T21:27:35","modified_gmt":"2026-04-30T13:27:35","slug":"sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/","title":{"rendered":"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[\n{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"headline\":\"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution\",\"author\":{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"name\":\"Dr Chee Hui Bing\",\"jobTitle\":\"Advocate & Solicitor\",\"worksFor\":{\"@type\":\"LegalService\",\"name\":\"Chris & Partners Advocates & Solicitors\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/hbchee.com\"}},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-04-30\"},\n{\"@type\":\"FAQPage\",\"mainEntity\":[{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"Has the 2018 LRA amendment changed Sivanes Rajaratnam?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Partially. The 2018 amendment removed the previous bias toward equal division and replaced it with a pure just-and-equitable standard. But Sivanes Rajaratnam's recognition of non-financial contribution remains good law and is regularly cited.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"How do I prove non-financial contribution?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Through detailed witness affidavits (your own and corroborating family\/friends), photographs, school records, household expense documentation, social-media posts establishing the marriage timeline, and any contemporaneous documents reflecting your role.\"}},{\"@type\":\"Question\",\"name\":\"What share is typical?\",\"acceptedAnswer\":{\"@type\":\"Answer\",\"text\":\"Highly fact-specific. For long marriages where one spouse was the homemaker, courts have awarded 40-50% of jointly accumulated assets and a smaller share of solely-acquired assets. We assess each case individually.\"}}]}\n]}\n<\/script><\/p>\n<article>\n<header>\n<h1>Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution<\/h1>\n<p class=\"byline\"><strong>By <a href=\"\/about-us\/\">Dr Chee Hui Bing<\/a>, Advocate &amp; Solicitor<\/strong> \u00b7 30 April 2026 \u00b7 Case note<\/p>\n<p class=\"lede\"><em>Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani Subramaniam<\/em> [2002] 3 MLJ 273 is one of the leading Federal Court decisions on the division of matrimonial assets under section 76 of the <em>Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976<\/em>. It cemented the principle that non-financial contributions \u2014 homemaking, child-raising, supporting the spouse&#8217;s career \u2014 are recognised in their own right.<\/p>\n<\/header>\n<section id=\"case-info\">\n<h2>Case at a glance<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Case name:<\/strong> <em>Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani Subramaniam<\/em><\/li>\n<li><strong>Citation:<\/strong> [2002] 3 MLJ 273<\/li>\n<li><strong>Court:<\/strong> Federal Court of Malaysia<\/li>\n<li><strong>Year:<\/strong> 2002<\/li>\n<li><strong>Practice area:<\/strong> <a href=\"\/family-law\/\">Family Law<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"background\">\n<h2>Background and facts<\/h2>\n<p>The appellant and respondent were divorcing parties. The dispute concerned the division of matrimonial assets acquired during the marriage. The wife had primarily looked after the home and children while the husband pursued his career and accumulated wealth. The question was the proper basis for division.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"issues\">\n<h2>The issue before the court<\/h2>\n<p>How should the court allocate matrimonial assets under section 76 of the LRA 1976 where one spouse contributed predominantly through homemaking and the other through paid employment? What weight should non-financial contributions receive?<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"holding\">\n<h2>Holding and reasoning<\/h2>\n<p>The Federal Court held that section 76(1) requires the court to apportion the matrimonial assets justly and equitably between the parties. Section 76(5) at the time provided that where assets were acquired by the sole effort of one party, the court should incline towards equality but lean in favour of the party making that effort.<\/p>\n<p>Crucially, the court recognised that non-financial contributions \u2014 including the running of the household and care of the children \u2014 are real contributions to the marriage and supported the wife&#8217;s claim to a substantial share even in respect of assets acquired through the husband&#8217;s earnings.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"implications\">\n<h2>Why this case still matters<\/h2>\n<p>For matrimonial litigation today:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>2018 LRA amendments<\/strong> removed the previous statutory inclination toward equal division. The current standard under section 76 is purely &#8220;just and equitable.&#8221; <em>Sivanes Rajaratnam<\/em> remains relevant for its treatment of non-financial contributions.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Evidence of contribution<\/strong> \u2014 homemakers should document the marriage history (photos, household expense records, witness statements, school-run logs).<\/li>\n<li><strong>Practical effect<\/strong> \u2014 even where one spouse earned all the income, the homemaker&#8217;s share of assets often falls in the 30-50% range depending on marriage length and contribution.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>See our <a href=\"\/family-law\/matrimonial-assets\/\">matrimonial assets practice page<\/a> for the modern framework.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"faq\">\n<h2>Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n<p><strong>Has the 2018 LRA amendment changed Sivanes Rajaratnam?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Partially. The 2018 amendment removed the previous bias toward equal division and replaced it with a pure just-and-equitable standard. But Sivanes Rajaratnam&#8217;s recognition of non-financial contribution remains good law and is regularly cited.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How do I prove non-financial contribution?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Through detailed witness affidavits (your own and corroborating family\/friends), photographs, school records, household expense documentation, social-media posts establishing the marriage timeline, and any contemporaneous documents reflecting your role.<\/p>\n<p><strong>What share is typical?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Highly fact-specific. For long marriages where one spouse was the homemaker, courts have awarded 40-50% of jointly accumulated assets and a smaller share of solely-acquired assets. We assess each case individually.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<section id=\"cta\">\n<h2>Free 30-minute consultation<\/h2>\n<p>If you have a matter that may turn on the principles in this case, we offer a free 30-minute first consultation. WhatsApp <a href=\"https:\/\/wa.me\/60177022800\">+60 17-702 2800<\/a> \u00b7 <a href=\"\/contact-us\/\" class=\"cta-button\">Book consultation<\/a><\/p>\n<\/section>\n<footer class=\"related\">\n<h2>Related<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><a href=\"\/family-law\/\">Family Law \u2014 Practice Area Hub<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/news-and-articles\/\">More news and articles<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/lawyer-batu-pahat\/\">Lawyer in Batu Pahat<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/lawyer-johor-bahru\/\">Lawyer in Johor Bahru<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"\/about-us\/\">About Dr Chee Hui Bing<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/footer>\n<\/article>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani Subramaniam [2002] 3 MLJ 273 is one of the leading Federal Court decisions on the division of matrimonial assets under section 76 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_glsr_average":0,"_glsr_ranking":0,"_glsr_reviews":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-civil-litigation"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution - Chris &amp; Partners Advocates &amp; Solicitors<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution - Chris &amp; Partners Advocates &amp; Solicitors\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani Subramaniam [2002] 3 MLJ 273 is one of the leading Federal Court decisions on the division of matrimonial assets under section 76 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Chris &amp; Partners Advocates &amp; Solicitors\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/chrisandpartnerslawyers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-04-30T13:27:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/chrispartners_newlogo-1.1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"544\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"574\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Dr Chee\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@TchrisPartnersT\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@TchrisPartnersT\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Dr Chee\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Dr Chee\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d022b8ade8ffe6f0fca29d352c29784a\"},\"headline\":\"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T13:27:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":552,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Civil Litigation\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/\",\"name\":\"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution - Chris &amp; Partners Advocates &amp; Solicitors\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2026-04-30T13:27:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/2026\\\/04\\\/30\\\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/\",\"name\":\"HBCHEE\",\"description\":\"Advocates &amp; Solicitors\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Chris & Partners Advocates & Solicitors\",\"alternateName\":\"Chee Hui Bing & Partners\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/chrispartners_newlogo-1-e1702458663844.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/08\\\/chrispartners_newlogo-1-e1702458663844.png\",\"width\":333,\"height\":371,\"caption\":\"Chris & Partners Advocates & Solicitors\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/chrisandpartnerslawyers\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/TchrisPartnersT\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d022b8ade8ffe6f0fca29d352c29784a\",\"name\":\"Dr Chee\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/076a22fa066df207f308992c41cd9dbd990bd5108f193f9726a5a677151c8dd1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/076a22fa066df207f308992c41cd9dbd990bd5108f193f9726a5a677151c8dd1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/076a22fa066df207f308992c41cd9dbd990bd5108f193f9726a5a677151c8dd1?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Dr Chee\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/hbchee.com\\\/wp\"]}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution - Chris &amp; Partners Advocates &amp; Solicitors","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution - Chris &amp; Partners Advocates &amp; Solicitors","og_description":"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani Subramaniam [2002] 3 MLJ 273 is one of the leading Federal Court decisions on the division of matrimonial assets under section 76 of the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce","og_url":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/","og_site_name":"Chris &amp; Partners Advocates &amp; Solicitors","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/chrisandpartnerslawyers","article_published_time":"2026-04-30T13:27:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":544,"height":574,"url":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/chrispartners_newlogo-1.1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Dr Chee","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@TchrisPartnersT","twitter_site":"@TchrisPartnersT","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Dr Chee","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/"},"author":{"name":"Dr Chee","@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#\/schema\/person\/d022b8ade8ffe6f0fca29d352c29784a"},"headline":"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution","datePublished":"2026-04-30T13:27:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/"},"wordCount":552,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Civil Litigation"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/","url":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/","name":"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution - Chris &amp; Partners Advocates &amp; Solicitors","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#website"},"datePublished":"2026-04-30T13:27:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/2026\/04\/30\/sivanes-rajaratnam-v-usha-rani-2002\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sivanes Rajaratnam v Usha Rani [2002] 3 MLJ 273: Matrimonial Assets and Non-Financial Contribution"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#website","url":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/","name":"HBCHEE","description":"Advocates &amp; Solicitors","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#organization","name":"Chris & Partners Advocates & Solicitors","alternateName":"Chee Hui Bing & Partners","url":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chrispartners_newlogo-1-e1702458663844.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/chrispartners_newlogo-1-e1702458663844.png","width":333,"height":371,"caption":"Chris & Partners Advocates & Solicitors"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/chrisandpartnerslawyers","https:\/\/x.com\/TchrisPartnersT"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/#\/schema\/person\/d022b8ade8ffe6f0fca29d352c29784a","name":"Dr Chee","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/076a22fa066df207f308992c41cd9dbd990bd5108f193f9726a5a677151c8dd1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/076a22fa066df207f308992c41cd9dbd990bd5108f193f9726a5a677151c8dd1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/076a22fa066df207f308992c41cd9dbd990bd5108f193f9726a5a677151c8dd1?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Dr Chee"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp"]}]}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1896\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/hbchee.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}